Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Quantum Machine Learning
Effect of alternating layered ansatzes on trainability of projected quantum kernel
arXiv
Authors: Yudai Suzuki, Muyuan Li
Year
2023
Paper ID
54266
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
148
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Quantum kernel methods have been actively examined from both theoretical and practical perspectives due to the potential of quantum advantage in machine learning tasks. Despite a provable advantage of fine-tuned quantum kernels for specific problems, widespread practical usage of quantum kernel methods requires resolving the so-called vanishing similarity issue, where exponentially vanishing variance of the quantum kernels causes implementation infeasibility and trainability problems. In this work, we analytically and numerically investigate the vanishing similarity issue in projected quantum kernels with alternating layered ansatzes. We find that variance depends on circuit depth, size of local unitary blocks and initial state, indicating the issue is avoidable if shallow alternating layered ansatzes are used and initial state is not highly entangled. Our work provides some insights into design principles of projected quantum kernels and implies the need for caution when using highly entangled states as input to quantum kernel-based learning models.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Machine Learning research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2023 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Quantum kernel methods have been actively examined from both theoretical and practical perspectives due to the potential of quantum advantage in machine learning tasks.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.