Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Superconducting Qubits
Quantum Sensing with Erasure Qubits
arXiv
Authors: Pradeep Niroula, Jack Dolde, Xin Zheng, Jacob Bringewatt, Adam Ehrenberg, Kevin C. Cox, Jeff Thompson, Michael J. Gullans, Shimon Kolkowitz, Alexey V. Gorshkov
Year
2023
Paper ID
54215
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
151
Citations
N/A
Abstract
The dominant noise in an "erasure qubit" is an erasure - a type of error whose occurrence and location can be detected. Erasure qubits have potential to reduce the overhead associated with fault tolerance. To date, research on erasure qubits has primarily focused on quantum computing and quantum networking applications. Here, we consider the applicability of erasure qubits to quantum sensing and metrology. We show theoretically that, for the same level of noise, an erasure qubit acts as a more precise sensor or clock compared to its non-erasure counterpart. We experimentally demonstrate this by artificially injecting either erasure errors (in the form of atom loss) or dephasing errors into a differential optical lattice clock comparison, and observe enhanced precision in the case of erasure errors for the same injected error rate. Similar benefits of erasure qubits to sensing can be realized in other quantum platforms like Rydberg atoms and superconducting qubits
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Superconducting Qubits research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2023 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- The dominant noise in an "erasure qubit" is an erasure - a type of error whose occurrence and location can be detected.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.