Quick Navigation
Topics
Photonic Quantum Computing
Record Photon Information Efficiency with Optical Clock Transmission and Recovery of 12.5 bits/photon over an Optical Channel with 77 dB Loss
arXiv
Authors: René-Jean Essiambre, Cheng Guo, Sai Kanth Dacha, Alexei Ashikhmin, Andrea Blanco-Redondo, Frank R. Kschischang, Konrad Banaszek, Matthew Weiner, Rose Kopf, Ian Crawley, Mohamad H. Idjadi, Ayed A. Sayem, Jie Zhao, James D. Sandoz, Nicolas Fontaine, Nicole Menkart, Roland Ryf, John Cloonan, Michael Vasilyev, Thomas E. Murphy, Ellsworth C. Burrows
Year
2023
Paper ID
54182
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
43
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We experimentally demonstrate optical detection at 12.5 bits per incident photon, 9.4 dB higher than the theoretical limit of conventional coherent detection. A single laser transmits both data and optical clock, undergoes 77 dB of attenuation before quantum detection followed by optical clock and data recovery.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Photonic Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2023 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We experimentally demonstrate optical detection at 12.5 bits per incident photon, 9.4 dB higher than the theoretical limit of conventional coherent detection.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.