Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Cryptography Security
The avalanche delay effect in sine-gated single-photon detector based on InGaAs/InP SPADs
arXiv
Authors: Alexandr Filyaev, Anton Losev, Vladimir Zavodilenko, Igor Pavlov
Year
2023
Paper ID
54075
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
109
Citations
N/A
Abstract
A sine-gated single-photon detector (SPD) intended for use in a quantum key distribution (QKD) system is considered in this paper. An "avalanche delay" effect in the sine-gated SPD is revealed. This effect consists in the appearance of an avalanche triggered at the next gate after the photon arrival gate. It has been determined experimentally that the nature of this effect is not related to the known effects of afterpulsing or charge persistence. This effect negatively affects the overall error rate in the QKD system. The influence of the main detector control parameters, such as temperature, gate amplitude and comparator's threshold voltage, on the avalanche delay effect was experimentally established.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Cryptography & Security research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2023 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- A sine-gated single-photon detector (SPD) intended for use in a quantum key distribution (QKD) system is considered in this paper.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.