Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Algorithms

Detector-based measurements for QFT: two issues and an AQFT proposal

arXiv
Authors: Nicola Pranzini, Esko Keski-Vakkuri

Year

2023

Paper ID

53975

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

116

Citations

N/A

Abstract

We present and investigate two issues within the measurement scheme for QFT presented by J. Polo-Gómez, L. J. Garay and E. Martín-Martínez in "A detector-based measurement theory for quantum field theory". We point out some discrepancies that arise when the measurement scheme is applied to contextual field states and show that n-point function assignments based on local processing regions sometimes lead to inconsistencies. To solve these issues, we modify the measurement scheme to use non-relativistic detectors to induce an update rule for algebraic states in the Haag-Kastler formulation of quantum field theory. In this way, n-point functions can be consistently evaluated across any region having a definite causal relation with measurements.

Why This Paper Matters

  • It adds a 2023 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • We present and investigate two issues within the measurement scheme for QFT presented by J.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #53975 #78853 When irrelevance governs: dissi... #78852 Quantum Information-Theoretic A... #78851 Quantum-assisted rendezvous on ... #78850 An Instability of the Quantum M...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.