!
You're viewing papers too quickly. Please wait a moment.<br>This helps keep the archive available for everyone.
Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Algorithms
Efficient Representation of Minimally Entangled Typical Thermal States in two dimensions via Projected Entangled Pair States
arXiv
Authors: Aritra Sinha, Marek M. Rams, Jacek Dziarmaga
Year
2023
Paper ID
53871
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
165
Citations
N/A
Abstract
The Minimally Entangled Typical Thermal States (METTS) are an ensemble of pure states, equivalent to the Gibbs thermal state, that can be efficiently represented by tensor networks. In this article, we use the Projected Entangled Pair States (PEPS) ansatz as to represent METTS on a two-dimensional (2D) lattice. While Matrix Product States (MPS) are less efficient for 2D systems due to their complexity growing exponentially with the lattice size, PEPS provide a more tractable approach. To substantiate the prowess of PEPS in modeling METTS (dubbed as PEPS-METTS), we benchmark it against the purification method for the 2D quantum Ising model at its critical temperature. Our analysis reveals that PEPS-METTS achieves accurate long-range correlations with significantly lower bond dimensions. We further corroborate this finding in the 2D Fermi Hubbard model at half-filling. At a technical level, we introduce an efficient zipper method to obtain PEPS boundary matrix product states needed to compute expectation values. The imaginary time evolution is performed with the neighbourhood tensor update.
Why This Paper Matters
- It adds a 2023 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- The Minimally Entangled Typical Thermal States (METTS) are an ensemble of pure states, equivalent to the Gibbs thermal state, that can be efficiently represented by tensor...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.