Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Machine Learning
Certainty In, Certainty Out: REVQCs for Quantum Machine Learning
arXiv
Authors: Hannah Helgesen, Michael Felsberg, Jan-Åke Larsson
Year
2023
Paper ID
53763
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
158
Citations
N/A
Abstract
The field of Quantum Machine Learning (QML) has emerged recently in the hopes of finding new machine learning protocols or exponential speedups for classical ones. Apart from problems with vanishing gradients and efficient encoding methods, these speedups are hard to find because the sampling nature of quantum computers promotes either simulating computations classically or running them many times on quantum computers in order to use approximate expectation values in gradient calculations. In this paper, we make a case for setting high single-sample accuracy as a primary goal. We discuss the statistical theory which enables highly accurate and precise sample inference, and propose a method of reversed training towards this end. We show the effectiveness of this training method by assessing several effective variational quantum circuits (VQCs), trained in both the standard and reversed directions, on random binary subsets of the MNIST and MNIST Fashion datasets, on which our method provides an increase of 10-15\% in single-sample inference accuracy.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Machine Learning research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2023 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- The field of Quantum Machine Learning (QML) has emerged recently in the hopes of finding new machine learning protocols or exponential speedups for classical ones.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.