Quick Navigation

Topics

Open Quantum Systems Decoherence Quantum Simulation Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations

Entropy and the link action in the causal set path-sum

Crossref
Authors: Abhishek Mathur, Anup Anand Singh, Sumati Surya

Year

2020

Paper ID

5354

Status

Peer-reviewed

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

89

Citations

13

Abstract

Abstract In causal set theory the gravitational path integral is replaced by a path-sum over a sample space Ω n of n -element causal sets. The contribution from non-manifold-like orders dominates Ω n for large n and therefore must be tamed by a suitable action in the low energy limit of the theory. We extend the work of Loomis and Carlip on the contribution of sub-dominant bilayer orders to the causal set path-sum and show that the ‘link action’ suppresses the dominant Kleitman–Rothschild orders for the same range of parameters.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2020 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • Abstract In causal set theory the gravitational path integral is replaced by a path-sum over a sample space Ω n of n -element causal sets.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #5354 #69027 Computational Superiority of No... #68993 Tomography of quantum states wi... #68981 Affine Filtering Measurements a... #69040 Collective Emission in LH2 Asse...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal • updated 2026-06-19 15:30:56

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.