Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Error Correction Fault Tolerance Quantum Circuit Design Gate Engineering Quantum Machine Learning

QSweep: Pulse-Optimal Single-Qudit Synthesis

arXiv
Authors: Ed Younis, Noah Goss

Year

2023

Paper ID

53430

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

91

Citations

N/A

Abstract

The synthesis of single-qudit unitaries has mainly been understudied, resulting in inflexible and non-optimal analytical solutions, as well as inefficient and impractical numerical solutions. To address this challenge, we introduce QSweep, a guided numerical synthesizer that produces pulse-optimal single-qudit decompositions for any subspace gateset, outperforming all prior solutions. When decomposing ququart gates, QSweep created circuits 4100x (up to 23500x) faster than QSearch with an average of 7.9 fewer pulses than analytical solutions, resulting in an overall 1.54x and 2.36x improvement in experimental single-qutrit and ququart gate fidelity as measured by randomized benchmarking.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Machine Learning research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2023 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • The synthesis of single-qudit unitaries has mainly been understudied, resulting in inflexible and non-optimal analytical solutions, as well as inefficient and impractical...

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #53430 #69584 OQMD: Single-Qubit Rotation Con... #69596 Comprehensive pKa Data Augmenta... #69549 REGRID-QAOA: A Resource-Efficie... #69540 Quantum Measurement and Continu...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.