Quick Navigation

Topics

Trapped Ion Quantum Computing Quantum Simulation

Accuracy vs Memory Advantage in the Quantum Simulation of Stochastic Processes

arXiv
Authors: Leonardo Banchi

Year

2023

Paper ID

53236

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

110

Citations

N/A

Abstract

Many inference scenarios rely on extracting relevant information from known data in order to make future predictions. When the underlying stochastic process satisfies certain assumptions, there is a direct mapping between its exact classical and quantum simulators, with the latter asymptotically using less memory. Here we focus on studying whether such quantum advantage persists when those assumptions are not satisfied, and the model is doomed to have imperfect accuracy. By studying the trade-off between accuracy and memory requirements, we show that quantum models can reach the same accuracy with less memory, or alternatively, better accuracy with the same memory. Finally, we discuss the implications of this result for learning tasks.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2023 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • Many inference scenarios rely on extracting relevant information from known data in order to make future predictions.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #53236 #69038 Physically Constrained Ensemble... #69023 Scalable Quantum Algorithms for... #68990 Driving Exchange Interaction in... #68985 Floquet Entanglement Generation...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.