Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Algorithms
Quantum null-hypothesis device-independent Schmidt rank witness
arXiv
Authors: Josep Batle, Tomasz Białecki, Tomasz Rybotycki, Jakub Tworzydło, Adam Bednorz
Year
2023
Paper ID
53191
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
111
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We investigate the dimensionality of bipartite quantum systems by construction of a device-independent null witness test. This test assesses whether a given bipartite state conforms with the expected quantum dimension, Schmidt number, and distinguishes between real and complex spaces. By employing local measurements on each party, the proposed method aims to determine the minimal rank. By performing an experimental demonstration on IBM Quantum devices, we prove the exceptional accuracy of the test and its usefulness in diagnostics beyond routine calibrations. One of the tests shows agreement with theoretical expectations within statistical errors. However, the second test failed by more than 6 standard deviations, indicating unspecified parasitic entanglements, with no known simple origin.
Why This Paper Matters
- It adds a 2023 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We investigate the dimensionality of bipartite quantum systems by construction of a device-independent null witness test.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.