Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Quantum walks advantage on the dihedral group for uniform sampling problem
arXiv
Authors: Shyam Dhamapurkar, Yuhang Dang, Saniya Wagh, Xiu-Hao Deng
Year
2023
Paper ID
53081
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
174
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Random walk algorithms are crucial for sampling and approximation problems in statistical physics and theoretical computer science. The mixing property is necessary for Markov chains to approach stationary distributions and is facilitated by walks. Quantum walks show promise for faster mixing times than classical methods but lack universal proof, especially in finite group settings. Here, we investigate the continuous-time quantum walks on Cayley graphs of the dihedral group D2n for odd n, generated by the smallest inverse closed symmetric subset. We present a significant finding that, in contrast to the classical mixing time on these Cayley graphs, which typically takes at least order Ω\(n2 log(1/2ε\)), the continuous-time quantum walk mixing time on D2n is of order O\(n (log n\)5 log(1/ε)), achieving a quadratic improvement over the classical case. Our paper advances the general understanding of quantum walk mixing on Cayley graphs, highlighting the improved mixing time achieved by continuous-time quantum walks on D2n. This work has potential applications in algorithms for a class of sampling problems based on non-abelian groups.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2023 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Random walk algorithms are crucial for sampling and approximation problems in statistical physics and theoretical computer science.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.