Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Quantum Simulation
Tensor Networks with Belief Propagation Cannot Feasibly Simulate Google's Quantum Echoes Experiment
arXiv
Authors: Pablo Bermejo, Benjamin Villalonga, Brayden Ware, Guifre Vidal, Aaron Szasz
Year
2026
Paper ID
52506
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
185
Citations
N/A
Abstract
In the recent quantum echoes experiment, Google Quantum AI showed that out-of-time-order correlators (OTOCs) for random-circuit time evolution can be measured using a quantum processor more than 10,000x faster than they can be computed to similar accuracy via classical computation. This claim was substantiated by comparison with a variety of state-of-the-art classical simulation methods. One classical simulation method that was not explicitly tested was tensor networks with belief propagation (TNBP). TNBP should be poorly suited to simulating Google's echoes experiment: the states involved are highly entangled, a challenge for tensor network states; and the Willow chip has dense 2D connectivity, a challenge for belief propagation. Here we confirm, via a combination of theoretical scaling arguments and explicit numerical simulation, the intuition that TNBP is unable to simulate the quantum echoes experiment. We show that the OTOC circuits generate enough entanglement that they are largely incompressible, implying that other approaches in which OTOCs are computed by evolving a tensor network state in the Schrödinger picture will also fail. Our results further reinforce the claim that the quantum echoes experiment cannot be reproduced by classical computation.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- In the recent quantum echoes experiment, Google Quantum AI showed that out-of-time-order correlators (OTOCs) for random-circuit time evolution can be measured using a quantum...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.