You're viewing papers too quickly. Please wait a moment.<br>This helps keep the archive available for everyone.

Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Error Correction Fault Tolerance

MacWilliams Identities for Intrinsic Quantum Codes

arXiv
Authors: Eric Kubischta, Ian Teixeira

Year

2026

Paper ID

52462

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

183

Citations

0

Abstract

We develop an intrinsic enumerator framework for quantum error correction in unitary representations of symmetry groups. An intrinsic quantum code is a subspace of a representation $V$ of a group $G$, and errors are organized by the decomposition of the conjugation representation on $\mathcal{L}(V)$ into isotypic subspaces. Associated with any orthogonal decomposition of $\mathcal{L}(V)$ we introduce two families of quadratic enumerators, called projector and twirl enumerators, which satisfy positivity, normalization, and Knill--Laflamme type inequalities. When the conjugation representation is multiplicity--free, these enumerators are related by a linear transform that we interpret as an intrinsic MacWilliams identity. For $G=\mathrm{SU}(2)$, we compute this transform explicitly in terms of Wigner $6j$-symbols. Applied to symmetric-power representations, this gives linear programming bounds for permutation-invariant qubit and qudit codes, including extremality results for the four-qubit, seven-qubit, and three-qutrit examples treated here. We also develop the general equivariant theory in the presence of multiplicities, where the enumerators become matrix-valued, the MacWilliams transform becomes block unitary, and the resulting feasibility problem becomes semidefinite; we illustrate this theory in a first non-multiplicity-free $\mathrm{SU}(3)$ example.

Paper Tools

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Compare Add to Reading List

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #52462 #59444 Qubit-oscillator concatenated c...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal • updated 2026-05-01 14:21:43

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.