Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Verifying random matrix product states with autoregressive local measurements
arXiv
Authors: Hyunho Cha, Subin Kim, Jungwoo Lee
Year
2026
Paper ID
52461
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
185
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Matrix product states (MPS) are a central language for one-dimensional quantum matter and a practical target for near-term quantum simulators and variational algorithms. Yet, while substantial effort has focused on preparing MPS with shallow circuits, scalable methods to verify that a many-body device has actually produced the intended state remain underdeveloped. Direct fidelity estimation (DFE) relies only on local Pauli measurements, but in many-body settings it suffers an exponential classical overhead from the preprocessing needed to sample Pauli strings. We eliminate this obstacle by introducing an autoregressive importance sampler that draws Pauli strings sequentially from efficiently computable conditional distributions, reducing the per-shot classical overhead to linear scaling in the number of qubits. We further develop a grouped extension that constructs qubit-wise commuting measurement settings via a sorting string and simultaneously estimates the entire commuting group from a single setting, significantly reducing estimator variance while preserving efficient postprocessing. Our approach extends naturally to matrix product operators (MPO), enabling scalable verification of tensor-network states and observables in long one-dimensional quantum systems. We utilize random MPS as a natural benchmark for generic 1D entangled states.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Matrix product states (MPS) are a central language for one-dimensional quantum matter and a practical target for near-term quantum simulators and variational algorithms.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.