Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Error Correction Fault Tolerance

Towards Ultra-High-Rate Quantum Error Correction with Reconfigurable Atom Arrays

arXiv
Authors: Chen Zhao, Casey Duckering, Andi Gu, Nishad Maskara, Hengyun Zhou

Year

2026

Paper ID

52443

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

167

Citations

0

Abstract

Quantum error correction is widely believed to be essential for large-scale quantum computation, but the required qubit overhead remains a central challenge. Quantum low-density parity-check codes can substantially reduce this overhead through high-rate encodings, yet finite-size instances with practical logical error rates often achieve encoding rates only around or below $1/10$. Here, building on a recent ultra-high-rate construction by Kasai, we identify new structural conditions on the underlying affine permutation matrices that make encoding rates exceeding $1/2$ compatible with efficient implementation on reconfigurable neutral atom arrays. These conditions define a co-designed family of ultra-high-rate quantum codes that supports efficient syndrome extraction and atom rearrangement under realistic parallel control constraints. Using a hierarchical decoder with high accuracy and good throughput, we study the performance under a circuit-level noise model with $p=0.1\%$, achieving per-logical-per-round error rates of $1.3_{-0.9}^{+3.0} \times 10^{-13}$ with a $\[[2304,1156,\leq 14\]]$ code and $2.9_{-1.5}^{+3.1} \times 10^{-11}$ with a $\[[1152,580,\leq 12\]]$ code. These results approach the teraquop regime, highlighting the promise of this code family for practical ultra-high-rate quantum error correction.

Paper Tools

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Compare Add to Reading List

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #52443 #59444 Qubit-oscillator concatenated c...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal • updated 2026-05-01 14:19:10

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.