Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Efficient characterization of general Gottesman-Kitaev-Preskill qubits
arXiv
Authors: Vojtěch Kuchař, Petr Marek
Year
2026
Paper ID
52388
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
147
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Practical utilization of Gottesman-Kitaev-Preskill (GKP) qubits requires not only the preparation of logical basis states, but also the ability to prepare and evaluate arbitrary logical qubit superpositions. Currently, this is typically done via quantum state tomography, which is resource-intensive. We introduce a family of positive semidefinite Hermitian operators, one for each point on the logical Bloch sphere, whose unique zero-eigenvalue ground states are the corresponding ideal GKP qubit states. We show that the expectation value of each operator serves as a witness of non-Gaussianity, and corresponds to twice the logical infidelity for states in the ideal logical GKP subspace. Furthermore, the truncated finite-dimensional counterparts of these operators yield physical approximations of arbitrary logical GKP states as their ground states. The evaluation of the proposed operators requires only three quadrature measurements, making this framework practical for both the experimental characterization and numerical optimization of GKP state preparation circuits.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Practical utilization of Gottesman-Kitaev-Preskill (GKP) qubits requires not only the preparation of logical basis states, but also the ability to prepare and evaluate...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.