Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Error Correction Fault Tolerance

Fault-Tolerant Cut-Cat State Syndrome Extraction for Quantum Codes

arXiv
Authors: Diego Forlivesi, Lorenzo Valentini, Marco Chiani

Year

2026

Paper ID

52385

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

114

Citations

0

Abstract

Reliable quantum computation requires fault-tolerant protocols to prevent errors from propagating during syndrome extraction in quantum error correction. We present a novel fault-tolerant syndrome extraction technique for CSS codes, which we refer to as the cut-cat state scheme. While each ancilla qubit interacts non-fault-tolerantly with a pair of data qubits, we introduce additional cat stabilizer measurements to identify and correct the resulting hook errors. Our approach maintains the key benefit of cat-based extraction, i.e., parallelized data qubit interactions, while reducing the number of simultaneous qubits required by more than half. Compared to flag-based state-of-the-art protocols, the cut-cat scheme offers a notable advantage in terms of two-qubit gate count as the code distance increases.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Error Correction & Fault Tolerance research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • Reliable quantum computation requires fault-tolerant protocols to prevent errors from propagating during syndrome extraction in quantum error correction.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #52385 #68397 Optimizing Parallel Execution o...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal • updated 2026-06-11 12:18:46

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.