Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Chemistry
Randomized Subsystem Descent for Fermion-to-Qubit Mapping
arXiv
Authors: Gengzhi Yang, Di Wu, Haizhao Yang, Xiaodi Wu, Ji Liu
Year
2026
Paper ID
52371
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
147
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We propose a versatile and efficient algorithmic framework for optimizing fermion-to-qubit mappings by generalizing the idea of randomized block coordinate descent. Our greedy approach, termed Randomized Subsystem Descent, iteratively samples a tractable subsystem from the full Hamiltonian, performs optimization within the subsystem under a given metric, and then reintegrates the updated subsystem into the global operator. Restricting the optimization to a subsystem at each iteration ensures computational efficiency, bypassing the dimensional bottlenecks that usually hinder global search heuristics. We benchmark our algorithm on one- and two-dimensional lattice hopping models, the Hubbard model with up to 16 times 16 sites, alongside a collection of molecular electronic-structure Hamiltonians with up to 54 modes and more than 180,000 Pauli strings. Across all benchmarks, our method consistently provides appreciable reduction in (weighted) Pauli weight, suggesting that Randomized Subsystem Descent is a practical and scalable framework for lowering the resource overhead of finding hardware-efficient Hamiltonian encodings.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Chemistry research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We propose a versatile and efficient algorithmic framework for optimizing fermion-to-qubit mappings by generalizing the idea of randomized block coordinate descent.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.