Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Quantum Foundations
Perfect quantum strategies for quantum magic rectangular games: a complete structural characterization
arXiv
Authors: Yueying Wu
Year
2026
Paper ID
52333
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
128
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Quantum magic rectangular games provide a natural setting for studying perfect quantum strategies and their underlying structure. However, existing analyses are largely case-specific and do not reveal a unifying characterization. In this work, we give a complete characterization of all perfect quantum strategies for quantum magic rectangular games, in the form of necessary and sufficient conditions on the shared state and measurement operators. Our approach identifies a structural set of constraints that any perfect strategy must satisfy, thereby providing a unified framework for understanding these games. As an illustration, our characterization shows that even in the 3 times 3 case, two pairs of bell states are not structurally enforced for perfect quantum strategies. More broadly, our results offer new insights into the structure of quantum correlations underlying perfect nonlocal strategies.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Foundations research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Quantum magic rectangular games provide a natural setting for studying perfect quantum strategies and their underlying structure.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.