Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Machine Learning
Single-shot quantum neural networks with amplitude estimation
arXiv
Authors: Jaemin Seo
Year
2026
Paper ID
52271
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
149
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Quantum neural networks (QNNs) suffer from a fundamental sampling bottleneck since quantum measurements are probabilistic, requiring many circuit executions to estimate outputs with sufficient accuracy. Conventional Monte-Carlo (MC) inference exhibits an mathcal{O}\(1/sqrt{N}\) sampling error, rendering QNN inference and training costly on near-term quantum hardware, especially where each shot requires expensive qubit generation. This work introduces a "single-shot" QNN framework by integrating quantum amplitude estimation (AE) into the readout stage. By embedding a trained QNN as a state-preparation oracle within AE, outputs are estimated through coherent interference rather than repeated sampling. We demonstrate that AE-based QNN inference achieves an mathcal{O}(1/N) error even with a single shot. We further analyze noise robustness and training feasibility, showing that AE can be a powerful primitive for overcoming the sampling overhead of QNNs. This highlights that when the model itself is quantum, quantum algorithms can enhance the computation efficiency.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Machine Learning research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Quantum neural networks (QNNs) suffer from a fundamental sampling bottleneck since quantum measurements are probabilistic, requiring many circuit executions to estimate outputs...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.