Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Machine Learning
Reinforcement Learning for Robust Calibration of Multi-Qudit Quantum Gates
arXiv
Authors: Amine Jaouadi, Sahel Ashhab
Year
2026
Paper ID
52235
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
179
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Higher-dimensional quantum systems, such as qudits, offer architectural and algorithmic advantages over qubits, but their increased spectral crowding and limited controllability render high-fidelity quantum gates particularly challenging. We propose a hybrid optimization framework that integrates optimal control theory methods with contextual deep reinforcement learning to achieve robust controlled-phase gates on two qutrits. Optimal control is first used to design high-fidelity control pulses for a nominal system model. Reinforcement learning is then employed as a calibration stage that learns small residual corrections to these pulses in the presence of static model mismatch, thereby preserving good gate performance under realistic parameter uncertainties. By learning structured, low-dimensional residual corrections conditioned on device-specific parameter variations, reinforcement learning enhances the transfer robustness of nominally optimal but parameter-sensitive control solutions across ensembles of devices. Crucially, the reinforcement learning step in our framework does not compete with the optimal control step but provides the adaptability required for realistic hardware, systematically reducing the sensitivity to parameter fluctuations. Our results establish reinforcement learning as a practical and scalable ingredient for robust calibration of quantum gates in high-dimensional systems.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Machine Learning research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Higher-dimensional quantum systems, such as qudits, offer architectural and algorithmic advantages over qubits, but their increased spectral crowding and limited...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.