Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Algorithms

Adiabatic Error Cancellation in Berry Phase Estimation

arXiv
Authors: Chusei Kiumi

Year

2026

Paper ID

52184

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

118

Citations

N/A

Abstract

In this work, we show that Berry phase estimation admits a natural and universal adiabatic error-cancellation mechanism, making it a promising candidate for practical quantum computing before full fault tolerance. Combining finite-runtime evolutions under pm H along the loop cancels the leading O\(T-1\) phase error exactly, and Richardson extrapolation further reduces the residual error to an oscillatory term with endpoint-controlled coefficient O\(\|dot H(0\)\|2Δ(0)-4T-2). Beyond this deterministic cancellation, we establish that, for suitable smooth runtime distributions, runtime randomization suppresses the remaining oscillatory contribution to O\(T-M\) for any fixed M, leading to a randomized Hadamard-test algorithm for Berry phase estimation over the full range [0,2π) with improved runtime scaling under standard sample complexity.

Why This Paper Matters

  • It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • In this work, we show that Berry phase estimation admits a natural and universal adiabatic error-cancellation mechanism, making it a promising candidate for practical quantum...

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #52184 #69983 Spectral Leakage and Masking Ef... #69982 Dimensionality Reduction of QAO... #69981 A Hybrid Quantum-Classical Appr... #69980 Complexity Inequalities for Qua...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.