Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Algorithms
Adiabatic Error Cancellation in Berry Phase Estimation
arXiv
Authors: Chusei Kiumi
Year
2026
Paper ID
52184
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
118
Citations
N/A
Abstract
In this work, we show that Berry phase estimation admits a natural and universal adiabatic error-cancellation mechanism, making it a promising candidate for practical quantum computing before full fault tolerance. Combining finite-runtime evolutions under pm H along the loop cancels the leading O\(T-1\) phase error exactly, and Richardson extrapolation further reduces the residual error to an oscillatory term with endpoint-controlled coefficient O\(\|dot H(0\)\|2Δ(0)-4T-2). Beyond this deterministic cancellation, we establish that, for suitable smooth runtime distributions, runtime randomization suppresses the remaining oscillatory contribution to O\(T-M\) for any fixed M, leading to a randomized Hadamard-test algorithm for Berry phase estimation over the full range [0,2π) with improved runtime scaling under standard sample complexity.
Why This Paper Matters
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- In this work, we show that Berry phase estimation admits a natural and universal adiabatic error-cancellation mechanism, making it a promising candidate for practical quantum...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.