Quick Navigation
Topics
Open Quantum Systems Decoherence
Time-Uniform Error Bound for Temporal Coarse Graining in Markovian Open Quantum Systems
arXiv
Authors: Teruhiro Ikeuchi, Takashi Mori
Year
2026
Paper ID
52160
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
147
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Several approximation procedures, such as the full or partial rotating-wave, time-averaging, and geometric-arithmetic approximations, have been proposed to derive Gorini-Kossakowski-Sudarshan-Lindblad (GKSL) generators from the Born-Markov quantum master equation (e.g., the Redfield equation). Establishing rigorous error bounds for these approximations is of fundamental and practical importance. However, existing bounds face two major limitations: they are highly specific to individual methods, and, more critically, they diverge in the long-time limit, ensuring the accuracy of the derived GKSL generator only in short-time regimes. In this Letter, we resolve both issues by deriving a unified, rigorous error bound for a general class of approximation methods - termed temporal coarse graining - that encompasses all aforementioned schemes. Crucially, our error bound is time-uniform. This guarantees that GKSL generators obtained via temporal coarse graining remain accurate for arbitrarily long times, provided the dissipation timescale is significantly longer than the bath correlation timescale.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Open Quantum Systems & Decoherence research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Several approximation procedures, such as the full or partial rotating-wave, time-averaging, and geometric-arithmetic approximations, have been proposed to derive...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.