Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Speed-oriented quantum circuit backend
arXiv
Authors: Sören Wilkening
Year
2026
Paper ID
52145
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
119
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We present a new software package for efficient quantum circuit generation, designed to achieve optimal runtime performance. Despite being in an early stage of development, our implementation demonstrates significant advantages over existing tools. Using the quantum Fourier transform (QFT) as a benchmark, we show that our backend can generate circuits for systems with up to 2000 qubits faster than widely used frameworks such as Qiskit and Q#. This improvement is particularly relevant for applications where classical preprocessing time, including circuit generation, must be minimized to not diminish any potential quantum advantage - for example, in combinatorial optimization tasks. Additionally, our software provides high-level primitives for bit- and integer-level manipulations, offering a simplified interface for integration with high-level quantum programming languages.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We present a new software package for efficient quantum circuit generation, designed to achieve optimal runtime performance.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.