Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Near-Term Reduction in Nonlocal Gate Count from Distributed Logical Qubits
arXiv
Authors: Bruno Avritzer, Nathan Sankary
Year
2026
Paper ID
52140
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
165
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Modular quantum computing architectures require error correction schemes that remain effective in the presence of noisy inter-processor operations. As such, minimizing the number of such operations on logical circuits partitioned across quantum processors is a primary objective of distributed quantum computing. In this work, we develop basic techniques for qubit allocation using an exemplar color code family and explore generalizations to other color codes. In particular, we show that a 10% reduction in processor-nonlocal gates is achievable in a setting where syndrome extraction occurs after every logical gate, as in today's devices, and that this scales to significantly greater advantages in the multi-qubit case. We also explore methods of achieving universal gate sets efficiently in this distributed logical setting and evaluate the trade-offs of multiple approaches such as magic state distillation, code switching, and a new method based on logical swaps. Finally, we discuss some considerations for an allocation algorithm for these architectures to perform scalably and connect it to existing work on quantum circuit partitions.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2026 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Modular quantum computing architectures require error correction schemes that remain effective in the presence of noisy inter-processor operations.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.