Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Qudit low-density parity-check codes
arXiv
Authors: Daniel J. Spencer, Andrew Tanggara, Tobias Haug, Derek Khu, Kishor Bharti
Year
2025
Paper ID
51673
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
161
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Qudits offer significant advantages over qubit-based architectures, including more efficient gate compilation, reduced resource requirements, improved error-correction primitives, and enhanced capabilities for quantum communication and cryptography. Yet, one of the most promising families of quantum error correction codes, namely quantum low-density parity-check (LDPC) codes, have so far been mostly restricted to qubits. Here, we generalize recent advancements in LDPC codes from qubits to qudits. We introduce a general framework for finding qudit LDPC codes and apply our formalism to several promising types of LDPC codes. We generalize bivariate bicycle codes, including their coprime variant; hypergraph product codes, including the recently proposed La-cross codes; subsystem hypergraph product (SHYPS) codes; high-dimensional expander codes, which make use of Ramanujan complexes; and fiber bundle codes. Using the qudit generalization formalism, we then numerically search for and decode several novel qudit codes compatible with near-term hardware. Our results highlight the potential of qudit LDPC codes as a versatile and hardware-compatible pathway toward scalable quantum error correction.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2025 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Qudits offer significant advantages over qubit-based architectures, including more efficient gate compilation, reduced resource requirements, improved error-correction...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.