Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Foundations
Optimizing LOCC Protocols on Product Stiefel Manifold
arXiv
Authors: Ze-Tong Li, Xin Wang
Year
2025
Paper ID
51644
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
167
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Local operations and classical communication (LOCC) is a foundational framework in quantum information from both theoretical and experimental perspectives. However, designing and optimizing LOCC protocols is intractable due to their complex structure. Determining achievable bounds and designing practically implementable LOCC protocols remain crucial challenges when the number of communication rounds is finite. In this work, we develop a framework to optimize fixed-round LOCC via Riemannian optimization on the product Stiefel manifold, which not only yields near-optimal objective function values but also produces fully implementable protocols. We demonstrate the applicability of this framework through key tasks in quantum information processing, such as entanglement distillation and state merging. Our results provide new insights into the achievable bounds for entanglement distillation and block entanglement state merging. We obtain improved distillation and state merging protocols, some of which match the upper bounds derived via positive partial transpose relaxations. These results demonstrate that optimizing LOCC via manifold optimization can serve as a powerful tool to advance research on distributed quantum information processing.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Foundations research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2025 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Local operations and classical communication (LOCC) is a foundational framework in quantum information from both theoretical and experimental perspectives.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.