Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Algorithms
Unitary Quantum Cellular Automata for Density Classification
arXiv
Authors: Pedro C. S. Costa, Yuval R. Sanders, Pedro Paulo Balbi, Gavin K. Brennen
Year
2025
Paper ID
51637
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
119
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We investigate the density classification task (DCT) - determining the majority bit in a one-dimensional binary lattice - within a quantum cellular automaton (CA) framework. While there is no one-dimensional two-state, radius r geq 1, deterministic CA with periodic boundary conditions that solves the DCT perfectly, we explore whether a unitary quantum model can succeed. We employ the Partitioned Unitary Quantum Cellular Automaton (PUQCA), a number-conserving model, and, via evolutionary search, find solutions to the DCT where the success condition is stipulated in terms of measurement probabilities rather than convergence to fixed-point configurations. Finally, we identify a classically simulable regime of the PUQCA in which we find rules that solve the DCT at fixed system sizes and analyze their performance.
Why This Paper Matters
- It adds a 2025 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We investigate the density classification task (DCT) - determining the majority bit in a one-dimensional binary lattice - within a quantum cellular automaton (CA) framework.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.