Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Superconducting Qubits
Dynamical error reshaping for dual-rail erasure qubits
arXiv
Authors: Filippos Dakis, Shruti Puri, Sophia E. Economou, Edwin Barnes
Year
2025
Paper ID
51483
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
139
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Erasure qubits - qubits designed to have an error profile that is dominated by detectable leakage errors - are a promising way to cut down the resources needed for quantum error correction. There have been several recent experiments demonstrating erasure qubits in superconducting quantum processors, most notably the dual-rail qubit defined by the one-photon subspace of two coupled cavities. An outstanding challenge is that the ancillary transmons needed to facilitate erasure checks and two-qubit gates introduce a substantial amount of noise, limiting the benefits of working with erasure-biased qubits. Here, we show how to suppress the adverse effects of transmon-induced noise while performing erasure checks or two-qubit gates. We present control schemes for these operations that suppress erasure check errors by three orders of magnitude and reduce the logical two-qubit gate infidelities by up to three orders of magnitude.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Superconducting Qubits research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2025 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Erasure qubits - qubits designed to have an error profile that is dominated by detectable leakage errors - are a promising way to cut down the resources needed for quantum...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.