Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Certifying Quantum Gates via Automata Advantage
arXiv
Authors: Anna Schroeder, Lucas B. Vieira, Jan Nöller, Nikolai Miklin, Mariami Gachechiladze
Year
2025
Paper ID
51382
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
153
Citations
N/A
Abstract
There is growing interest in developing rigorous tests of quantumness that are feasible even before practical quantum advantages become a reality. Such tests not only aim to certify the quantum nature of a system but also serve as benchmarks for precise quantum control. In this work, we argue that promise problems, studied in the theory of finite automata, provide a natural framework for designing sound tests of quantum gate quality. Soundness, the property that only implementations of sufficiently high quality can pass the test, is a central requirement for meaningful certification. We study several promise problems relevant to quantum gate testing and establish separations between the memory resources required by quantum and classical finite automata to solve them. These separations form the theoretical basis for using promise problems as tests of quantumness. Finally, we show how results from automata theory, in particular the minimality of automata, can be used to derive soundness guarantees.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2025 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- There is growing interest in developing rigorous tests of quantumness that are feasible even before practical quantum advantages become a reality.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.