Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Simplified Quantum Weight Reduction with Optimal Bounds
arXiv
Authors: Min-Hsiu Hsieh, Xingjian Li, Ting-Chun Lin
Year
2025
Paper ID
51380
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
175
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Quantum weight reduction is the task of transforming a quantum code with large check weight into one with small check weight. Low-weight codes are essential for implementing quantum error correction on physical hardware, since high-weight measurements cannot be executed reliably. Weight reduction also serves as a critical theoretical tool, which may be relevant to the quantum PCP conjecture. We introduce a new procedure for quantum weight reduction that combines geometric insights with coning techniques, which simplifies Hastings' previous approach while achieving better parameters. Given an arbitrary [[n,k,d]] quantum code with weight w, our method produces a code with parameters \[[O\(n w2 log w\), k, Ω(d w)\]] with check weight 5 and qubit weight 6. When applied to random dense CSS codes, our procedure yields explicit quantum codes that surpass the square-root distance barrier, achieving parameters \[[n, O\(n1/3\), Ω\(n2/3\)\]]. Furthermore, these codes admit a three-dimensional embedding that saturates the Bravyi-Poulin-Terhal (BPT) bound. As a further application, our weight reduction technique improves fault-tolerant logical operator measurements by reducing the number of ancilla qubits.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2025 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Quantum weight reduction is the task of transforming a quantum code with large check weight into one with small check weight.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.