Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Autler-Townes spectroscopy of a Rydberg ladder
arXiv
Authors: Tai Xiang, Yue-Hui Lu, Jacquelyn Ho, Tsai-Chen Lee, Zhenjie Yan, Dan M. Stamper-Kurn
Year
2025
Paper ID
51211
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
153
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Ladder-type two-photon excitation of an atom from a ground state |grangle, to an intermediate excited state |erangle, and, finally, to a Rydberg state |rrangle, has a variety of uses from quantum information to sensing. A common scheme for detecting this transition optically is through electromagnetically induced transparency (EIT). However, in inverted wavelength schemes, where the ground-to-excited transition wavelength is shorter than the excited-to-Rydberg transition wavelength, the strength of the EIT feature on the lower-leg beam is strongly reduced in a Doppler-broadened medium. Here, we report on an alternative two-photon spectroscopic feature, which we term the two-photon Autler-Townes resonance, observed on the upper-leg beam. Compared to the EIT signal, this feature's superior signal-to-noise ratio allows one to resolve Rydberg resonances with principal quantum number as high as n=80. We also show that such a feature can be utilized to generate an error signal for stabilizing the frequency of the upper-leg beam.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2025 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Ladder-type two-photon excitation of an atom from a ground state |grangle, to an intermediate excited state |erangle, and, finally, to a Rydberg state |rrangle, has a variety...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.