Quick Navigation
Topics
Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations
Quantum Foundations
Equivalence of Genuine Multipartite Entanglement and Nonlocality of Nearly Symmetric Multiqubit Pure States
arXiv
Authors: Jakub Wójcik, Wojciech Bruzda, Ignacy Stachura, Remigiusz Augusiak
Year
2025
Paper ID
51206
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
96
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Whether every pure genuinely multipartite entangled (GME) state necessarily exhibits genuine multipartite nonlocality (GMNL) remains an open question. By combining a recently proposed Bell inequality \[I. Stachura et al., \href{https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1367-2630/ad7753}{New J. Phys. 26, 093029 (2024)}\] with Hardy's paradox and the canonical decomposition of pure states, we analytically demonstrate that all highly symmetric, genuinely entangled multipartite qubit states exhibit genuine multipartite nonlocality, thereby supporting Gisin's conjecture in the multipartite setting. This result constitutes a step toward a general proof of the conjectured equivalence between GME and GMNL in quantum theory.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Foundations research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2025 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Whether every pure genuinely multipartite entangled (GME) state necessarily exhibits genuine multipartite nonlocality (GMNL) remains an open question.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.