Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Cryptography Security
Cryptanalysis and improvement of a semi-quantum private comparison protocol based on Bell states
arXiv
Authors: Li Xie, Qin Li, Fang Yu, Xiaoping Lou, Cai Zhang
Year
2020
Paper ID
512
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
127
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Semi-quantum private comparison (SQPC) allows two participants with limited quantum ability to securely compare the equality of their secrets with the help of a semi-dishonest third party (TP). Recently, Jiang proposed a SQPC protocol based on Bell states (Quantum Inf Process 19(6): 180, 2020) and claimed it is secure. In this paper, we present two types of attack on Jiang's SQPC protocol. In the first type of attack, an outside eavesdropper will make participants accept a wrong result. In the second type of attack, a malicious participant will not only make the other participant accept a wrong result, but also learn the secret of the honest participant. Neither type of attack will be detected. In addition, we propose an improved SQPC protocol that can resist these two types of attack.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Cryptography & Security research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2020 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Semi-quantum private comparison (SQPC) allows two participants with limited quantum ability to securely compare the equality of their secrets with the help of a semi-dishonest...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.