Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Optimization
Performance Comparison of Gate-Based and Adiabatic Quantum Computing for AC Power Flow Problem
arXiv
Authors: Zeynab Kaseb, Matthias Moller, Peter Palensky, Pedro P. Vergara
Year
2025
Paper ID
51199
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
144
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We present the first direct comparison between gate-based quantum computing (GQC) and adiabatic quantum computing (AQC) paradigms for solving the AC power flow (PF) equations. The PF problem is reformulated as a combinatorial optimization problem. For the GQC approach, the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) is employed, while for the AQC approach, the problem is formulated as an Ising model. Numerical experiments on a 4-bus test system evaluate solution accuracy and computational performance. Results obtained using QAOA are benchmarked against those produced by D-Wave's Advantage system and Fujitsu's latest-generation Digital Annealer, implemented through the Quantum-Inspired Integrated Optimization (QIIO) software. The findings provide quantitative insights into the performance trade-offs, scalability, and practical viability of GQC and AQC paradigms for PF analysis, highlighting the potential of quantum optimization algorithms to address the computational challenges associated with the operation of modern electricity grids in the fault-tolerant era.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Optimization research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2025 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We present the first direct comparison between gate-based quantum computing (GQC) and adiabatic quantum computing (AQC) paradigms for solving the AC power flow (PF) equations.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.