Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Optimization
Quantum Foundations
A Rigorous Quantum Framework for Inequality-Constrained and Multi-Objective Binary Optimization
arXiv
Authors: Sebastian Egginger, Kristina Kirova, Sonja Bruckner, Stefan Hillmich, Richard Kueng
Year
2025
Paper ID
51166
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
134
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Encoding combinatorial optimization problems into physically meaningful Hamiltonians with tractable energy landscapes forms the foundation of quantum optimization. Numerous works have studied such efficient encodings for the class of Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO) problems. However, many real-world tasks are constrained, and handling equality and, in particular, inequality constraints on quantum computers remains a major challenge. In this letter, we show that including inequality constraints is equivalent to solving a multi-objective optimization. This insight motivates the Multi-Objective Quantum Approximation (MOQA) framework, which approximates the maximum via smaller p-norms and comes with rigorous performance guarantees. MOQA operates directly at the Hamiltonian level and is compatible with, but not restricted to, ground-state solvers such as quantum adiabatic annealing, the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA), or imaginary-time evolution. Moreover, it is not limited to quadratic functions.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Foundations research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2025 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Encoding combinatorial optimization problems into physically meaningful Hamiltonians with tractable energy landscapes forms the foundation of quantum optimization.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.