Quick Navigation

Topics

Quantum Algorithms

Quantum Classical Correspondence Using Coherent State Measurements and Husimi Q Probability Distributions

arXiv
Authors: Youheng Zheng

Year

2025

Paper ID

51157

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

105

Citations

N/A

Abstract

We propose and simulate a protocol to evolve a quantum particle forward in time such that its trajectory closely matches that of the particle's Newtonian counterpart. Using short bursts of Schrödinger time-evolution interleaved with positive operator-valued measurements (POVMs) in the coherent basis, we demonstrate quantum-classical convergence for durations far beyond Schrödinger time-evolution alone. We examine the impact of the time between measurements Δt and the reduced Planck's constant hbar on divergence time. Results indicate that for appropriate values of Δt, smaller values of hbar lead to longer divergence times. This method suggests a elegant, intuitive bridge to recover classical motion from quantum postulates.

Why This Paper Matters

  • It adds a 2025 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • We propose and simulate a protocol to evolve a quantum particle forward in time such that its trajectory closely matches that of the particle's Newtonian counterpart.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #51157 #78853 When irrelevance governs: dissi... #78852 Quantum Information-Theoretic A... #78851 Quantum-assisted rendezvous on ... #78850 An Instability of the Quantum M...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.