Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Exact Quantum Circuit Optimization is co-NQP-hard
arXiv
Authors: Adam Husted Kjelstrøm, Andreas Pavlogiannis, Jaco van de Pol
Year
2025
Paper ID
51047
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
170
Citations
N/A
Abstract
As quantum computing resources remain scarce and error rates high, minimizing the resource consumption of quantum circuits is essential for achieving practical quantum advantage. Here we consider the natural problem of, given a circuit C, computing a circuit C' which behaves equivalently on a desired subspace, and that minimizes a quantum resource type, expressed as the count or depth of (i) arbitrary gates, or (ii) non-Clifford gates, or (iii) superposition gates, or (iv) entanglement gates. We show that, when C is expressed over any gate set that can implement the H and TOF gates exactly, each of the above optimization problems is hard for co-NQP, and hence outside the Polynomial Hierarchy, unless the Polynomial Hierarchy collapses. This complements recent results in the literature which established an NP-hardness lower bound when equivalence is over the full state space, and tightens the gap to the corresponding NPNQP upper bound known for cases (i)-(iii) over Clifford+T and (i)-(iv) over H+TOF circuits.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2025 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- As quantum computing resources remain scarce and error rates high, minimizing the resource consumption of quantum circuits is essential for achieving practical quantum advantage.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.