Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Mitigating Detuning-Induced Systematic Errors in Entanglement-Enhanced Metrology
arXiv
Authors: Shingo Kukita, Yuichiro Matsuzaki
Year
2025
Paper ID
51030
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
117
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Quantum sensing leverages non-classical resources to enhance precision. In particular, Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger (GHZ) states can, in principle, attain the Heisenberg limit that surpasses the standard quantum limit. While many studies have examined how open-system noise-typically modeled with Lindblad master equations-degrades GHZ-based metrology, coherent control imperfections during state preparation and readout have received less attention. Here, we analyze the effect of detuning between actual and nominal spin frequencies in a GHZ-state preparation scheme employing a frequency selective pulse. We show that detuning induces coherent, systematic error that prevents GHZ sensing from reaching the Heisenberg limit. To mitigate this effect, we design a composite-pulse protocol that compensates for detuning-induced errors and improves the sensitivity under the effect of coherent error.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2025 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Quantum sensing leverages non-classical resources to enhance precision.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.