Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Trapped-ion two-qubit gates with >99.99% fidelity without ground-state cooling
arXiv
Authors: A. C. Hughes, R. Srinivas, C. M. Löschnauer, H. M. Knaack, R. Matt, C. J. Ballance, M. Malinowski, T. P. Harty, R. T. Sutherland
Year
2025
Paper ID
51003
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
88
Citations
N/A
Abstract
We introduce the 'smooth gate', an entangling method for trapped-ion qubits where residual spin-motion entanglement errors are adiabatically eliminated by ramping the gate detuning. We demonstrate electronically controlled two-qubit gates with an estimated error of 8.4(7)times10-5 without ground-state cooling. We further show that the error remains lesssim 5times10-4 for ions with average phonon occupation up to bar{n}=9.4(3) on the gate mode. These results indicate that trapped-ion quantum computation can achieve high fidelity at temperatures above the Doppler limit, which enables faster and simpler device operation.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2025 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- We introduce the 'smooth gate', an entangling method for trapped-ion qubits where residual spin-motion entanglement errors are adiabatically eliminated by ramping the gate...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.