Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Quantum Simulation
Low overhead circuit cutting with operator backpropagation
arXiv
Authors: Debarthi Pal, Ritajit Majumdar
Year
2025
Paper ID
50909
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
204
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Current quantum computers suffer from noise due to lack of error correction. Several techniques to mitigate the effect of noise have been studied, in particular to extract the expectation value of observables. One such technique, circuit cutting, partitions large circuits into smaller, less noisy subcircuits, but the exponential increase in the number of circuit executions limits its scalability. Another method, operator backpropagation (OBP) reduces circuit depth by classically simulating parts of it, yet often escalates the number of circuit executions by some factor due to additional non-commuting terms in the updated observable. This paper introduces an optimized approach for minimizing noise in quantum circuits using operator backpropagation (OBP) combined with circuit cutting. We demonstrate that the strategic use of OBP with circuit cutting can mitigate the execution overhead. By employing simulated annealing, our proposed method identifies the optimal backpropagation parameter for specific circuits and observables, maximizing resource reduction in cutting. Results show a 3x and 10x decrease in resource requirements for Variational Quantum Eigensolver and Hamiltonian simulation circuits respectively, while maintaining or even enhancing accuracy. This approach also yields similar savings for other circuits from the Benchpress database and various observable weights, providing an efficient method to lower circuit cutting overhead without compromising performance.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Simulation research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2025 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Current quantum computers suffer from noise due to lack of error correction.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.