Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Experimental differentiation and extremization with analog quantum circuits
arXiv
Authors: Evan Philip, Julius de Hond, Vytautas Abramavicius, Kaonan Micadei, Mario Dagrada, Panagiotis Barkoutsos, Mourad Beji, Louis-Paul Henry, Vincent E. Elfving, Antonio A. Gentile, Savvas Varsamopoulos
Year
2025
Paper ID
50832
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
162
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Solving and optimizing differential equations (DEs) is ubiquitous in both engineering and fundamental science. The promise of quantum architectures to accelerate scientific computing thus naturally involved interest towards how efficiently quantum algorithms can solve DEs. Differentiable quantum circuits (DQC) offer a viable route to compute DE solutions using a variational approach amenable to existing quantum computers, by producing a machine-learnable surrogate of the solution. Quantum extremal learning (QEL) complements such approach by finding extreme points in the output of learnable models of unknown (implicit) functions, offering a powerful tool to bypass a full DE solution, in cases where the crux consists in retrieving solution extrema. In this work, we provide the results from the first experimental demonstration of both DQC and QEL, displaying their performance on a synthetic usecase. Whilst both DQC and QEL are expected to require digital quantum hardware, we successfully challenge this assumption by running a closed-loop instance on a commercial analog quantum computer, based upon neutral atom technology.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Trapped-Ion Quantum Computing research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2025 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Solving and optimizing differential equations (DEs) is ubiquitous in both engineering and fundamental science.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.