Quick Navigation
Topics
Trapped Ion Quantum Computing
Quantum Foundations
Certifying Randomness or its Lack Thereof for General Network Scenarios
arXiv
Authors: Maria Ciudad Alañón, Daniel Centeno, Andrew Watford, Elie Wolfe
Year
2025
Paper ID
50811
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
167
Citations
N/A
Abstract
The certification of intrinsic randomness is foundational to quantum information theory and central in many practical applications thereof, such as in the generation of unquestionably random numbers and in cryptographic protocols. Device-independent randomness certification based on violations of Bell inequalities has been thoroughly investigated within the standard Bell scenario. In this work, we aim to extend this line of research by exploring randomness certification in more general causal structures, namely, network scenarios. To address this task, we demonstrate how the computational tool known as the inflation technique can be adapted. As proof of concept, we use inflation to certify randomness relative to a beyond-quantum adversary for sample probability distributions obtained in the bilocality and triangle scenarios. Complementarily, we also provide computational methods for the problem of certifying an absence of randomness, which should not be conflated with certifying the classicality of a given probability distribution. We conclude with a discussion of conceptual subtleties regarding randomness certification in networks, highlighting important open problems in this nascent research field.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Foundations research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2025 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- The certification of intrinsic randomness is foundational to quantum information theory and central in many practical applications thereof, such as in the generation of...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.