Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Algorithms
Rigorous test of the Raleigh-Ritz method for Mexican hat type potentials
arXiv
Authors: A. M. Rodriguez Zarate, T. Thiemann
Year
2025
Paper ID
50759
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
159
Citations
N/A
Abstract
Interesting quantum integrable models are rare and one often has to resort to approximation methods. One of these is the Raleigh Ritz method which under certain circumstances allows to approximately compute the lowest energy eigenstate (or ground state) of a given Hamiltonian whose pure point spectrum is bounded from below. The quality of such approximations can then be tested numerically or sometimes by abstract arguments. However, the numerical test is limited by computing power. In order to perform a rigorous test, one would need to have at one's disposal 1. a physically interesting model that is 2. solvable to sufficient extent in order that 3. the exact ground state is known in closed form. In this contribution we show that certain anharmonic potentials of the Mexican hat type belong to this class of models. The corresponding Schroedinger type Hamiltonian can be considered as a crude quantum mechanical toy model Hamiltonian for the Higgs field in the standard model of elementary particle physics.
Why This Paper Matters
- It adds a 2025 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- Interesting quantum integrable models are rare and one often has to resort to approximation methods.
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.