Quick Navigation

Topics

Open Quantum Systems Decoherence Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations

Decrease of entanglement by local operations in the Dür-Cirac method

arXiv
Authors: Yukihiro Ota, Motoyuki Yoshida, Ichiro Ohba

Year

2007

Paper ID

50604

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

100

Citations

N/A

Abstract

One cannot always obtain information about entanglement by the Dür-Cirac (DC) method. The impracticality is attributed to the decrease of entanglement by local operations in the DC method. We show that, even in 2--qubit systems, there exist states whose entangled property the DC method never evaluates. The class of such states in 2--qubit systems is completely characterized by the value of the fully entangled fraction. Actually, a state whose fully entangled fraction is less than or equal to 1/2 is always transformed into a separable state by local operations in the DC method, even if it has negative partial transposition.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Entanglement Theory & Quantum Correlations research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2007 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • One cannot always obtain information about entanglement by the Dür-Cirac (DC) method.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #50604 #68455 Mediative Fuzzy Logic: From Typ... #68426 On the Approximate Non-Determin... #68463 Full characterization of inform... #68461 Agreement and Compatibility in ...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.