Quick Navigation
Topics
Quantum Measurement State Discrimination
Lddot{u}der rule, von Neumann rule and Cirelson's bound of Bell CHSH inequality
arXiv
Authors: Asmita Kumari, A. K. Pan
Year
2020
Paper ID
506
Status
Preprint
Abstract Read
~2 min
Abstract Words
178
Citations
N/A
Abstract
In [PRL, 113, 050401 (2014)] the authors have shown that instead of Lddot{u}der rule, if degeneracy breaking von Neumann projection rule is adopted for state reduction, the quantum value of three-time Leggett-Garg inequality can exceed it's Lddot{u}ders bound. Such violation of Lddot{u}ders bound may even approach algebraic maximum of the inequality in the asymptotic limit of system size. They also claim that for Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt (CHSH) inequality such violation of Lddot{u}ders bound (known as Cirelson's bound) cannot be obtained even when the measurement is performed sequentially first by Alice followed by Bob. In this paper, we have shown that if von Neumann projection rule is used, quantum bound of CHSH inequality exceeds it's Cirelson's bound and may also reach its algebraic maximum four. This thus provide a strong objection regarding the viability of von Neumann rule as a valid state reduction rule. Further, we pointed out that the violation of Cirelson's bound occurs due to the injection of additional quantum non-locality by the act of implementing von Neumann measurement rule.
Why This Paper Matters
- This paper contributes to the Quantum Measurement & State Discrimination research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
- It adds a 2020 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
- In [PRL, 113, 050401 (2014)] the authors have shown that instead of Lddotuder rule, if degeneracy breaking von Neumann projection rule is adopted for state reduction, the...
Paper Tools
Become a member to use research tools
Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.
Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share
Cite This Paper
Copy URL
Compare
Copy DOI Add to Reading List
Category Correction Request
Category Correction Request
Help us improve classification quality by proposing a better category. Every request is reviewed by an admin.
Sign in to submit a category correction request for this paper.
Log In to SubmitReferences & Citation Signals
Community Reactions
Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.
Score:
0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Sign in to react to this paper.
Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)
Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)
No written reviews yet.