Quick Navigation

Topics

Open Quantum Systems Decoherence Quantum Chemistry Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations

Effect of atomic beam alignment on photon correlation measurements in cavity QED

arXiv
Authors: L. Horvath, H. J. Carmichael

Year

2007

Paper ID

50587

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

102

Citations

N/A

Abstract

Quantum trajectory simulations of a cavity QED system comprising an atomic beam traversing a standing-wave cavity are carried out. The delayed photon coincident rate for forwards scattering is computed and compared with the measurements of Rempe et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 1727 (1991)] and Foster et al. [Phys. Rev. A 61, 053821 (2000)]. It is shown that a moderate atomic beam misalignment can account for the degradation of the predicted correlation. Fits to the experimental data are made in the weak-field limit with a single adjustable parameter--the atomic beam tilt from perpendicular to the cavity axis. Departures of the measurement conditions from the weak-field limit are discussed.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Quantum Chemistry research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2007 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • Quantum trajectory simulations of a cavity QED system comprising an atomic beam traversing a standing-wave cavity are carried out.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #50587 #68455 Mediative Fuzzy Logic: From Typ... #68437 Transition-state lattice modes ... #68426 On the Approximate Non-Determin... #68465 Bounding Eigenstate Overlap fro...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.