Quick Navigation

Topics

Superconducting Qubits Open Quantum Systems Decoherence

Passive Cooling of a Micromechanical Oscillator with a Resonant Electric Circuit

arXiv
Authors: K. R. Brown, J. Britton, R. J. Epstein, J. Chiaverini, D. Leibfried, D. J. Wineland

Year

2007

Paper ID

50367

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

90

Citations

N/A

Abstract

We cool the fundamental mode of a miniature cantilever by capacitively coupling it to a driven rf resonant circuit. Cooling results from the rf capacitive force, which is phase shifted relative to the cantilever motion. We demonstrate the technique by cooling a 7 kHz cantilever from room temperature to 45 K, obtaining reasonable agreement with a model for the cooling, damping, and frequency shift. Extending the method to higher frequencies in a cryogenic system could enable ground state cooling and may prove simpler than related optical experiments in a low temperature apparatus.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Superconducting Qubits research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2007 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • We cool the fundamental mode of a miniature cantilever by capacitively coupling it to a driven rf resonant circuit.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #50367 #68449 Scale-Invariant Open Quantum Sy... #68437 Transition-state lattice modes ... #68470 A fluxonium qubit-based hybrid ... #68456 Analytic Properties of the Jost...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.