You're viewing papers too quickly. Please wait a moment.<br>This helps keep the archive available for everyone.

Quick Navigation

Topics

Entanglement Theory Quantum Correlations

The tripartite separability of density matrices of graphs

arXiv
Authors: Zhen Wang, Zhixi Wang

Year

2007

Paper ID

50257

Status

Preprint

Abstract Read

~2 min

Abstract Words

84

Citations

N/A

Abstract

The density matrix of a graph is the combinatorial laplacian matrix of a graph normalized to have unit trace. In this paper we generalize the entanglement properties of mixed density matrices from combinatorial laplacian matrices of graphs discussed in Braunstein {\it et al.} Annals of Combinatorics, {\bf 10}(2006)291 to tripartite states. Then we proved that the degree condition defined in Braunstein {\it et al.} Phys. Rev. A {\bf 73}, (2006)012320 is sufficient and necessary for the tripartite separability of the density matrix of a nearest point graph.

Why This Paper Matters

  • This paper contributes to the Entanglement Theory & Quantum Correlations research area in the Quantum Articles archive.
  • It adds a 2007 reference point for readers tracking recent quantum research.
  • The density matrix of a graph is the combinatorial laplacian matrix of a graph normalized to have unit trace.

Paper Tools

Become a member to use research tools

Sign in to open papers, visit source links, share, cite, compare, copy DOI links, request category corrections, and build your reading list.

Show Paper arXiv Publisher Share Cite This Paper Copy URL Compare Copy DOI Add to Reading List Category Correction Request

References & Citation Signals

Local Citation Graph (Related-Paper Links)

Current Paper #50257 #69598 The classical boundaries of the... #69597 Tripartite Entanglement in $e^+... #69593 Local correlations in long-rang... #69591 Compact graphs and quantum auto...

External citation index: OpenAlex citation signal

Community Reactions

Quick sentiment from readers on this paper.

Score: 0
Likes: 0 Dislikes: 0

Sign in to react to this paper.

Discussion & Reviews (Moderated)

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 (0 ratings)

No written reviews yet.